Interpreting the variorum essay by stanley fish

What is it that I am doing? Fish suggests that this shifting textual stability brings the text into doubt and tends to rest interpretive meaning with the interpretive community. What is syntactic slide? He and Fish may be tempted to say that they agree about the poem.

This example illustrates the dangers of letting the reader determine the meaning with interpretations that find no logical point. Friday, September 30, "Interpreting the Variorum. I expect it to be lyrical and personal based on the other poems by Lucille Clifton with which I am familiar. An Interpreting the variorum essay by stanley fish that cannot be justified is an activity that refuses to regard itself as instrumental to some larger good.

Rather, I am proceeding in the basis of two interpretive decisions. In the final sectionFish argues the need for interpretative communities. Any attempt to determine which of a number of readings is correct will necessarily fail.

However, other upbringings and backgrounds witness the brutal nature of war and its inhuman effects. Interpretive communities are made up of those who share interpretive strategies not for reading but for writing texts, for constituting their properties and assigning their intentions.

Just another site

The notion of interpretive communities saves us from interpretive anarchy. The first question that concerns him addresses the reasons behind why the same reader will interpret different texts in different ways, and the second question that he addresses explores the reasons why different readers will interpret the same text in a similar way.

Fish undertakes a detailed analysis of the poem. A frequent idea that we pointed to in class was the concept of reading Lolita by Nabokov and instantly believing that the point of the novel was that 12 year old girls are attractive.

One of us might then be tempted to complain to the other that we could not possibly be reading the same poem. On the other hand, the readers who approach the text with a different set of assumptions and therefore employ different methods of reading the text will reach a different interpretation.

For if there are no fixed texts, but only interpretive strategies making them; and if interpretive strategies are not matural, but learned While, few academic readers would take the argument as far as Fish does, his work brings the attention to the reception of literary works, asserting their existence, not only or even primarily in the physical world, but rather in the mental world of the reader, who does not exist in a vacuum, and does not approach a text or anything else for that matterwith a purely open and unbiased perception.

Identifying the idea of Reader-Response Theory and the strength we put into the belief that the readers hold, at least for Fish, all the power in determining the interpretation, the intentions of the author become minimal.

This signifies that while a text may be stable in an interpretive community, it is not universally stable and the community stability is compromised when community members shift to other communities.

The first two volumes of the Milton Variorum Commentary have now appeared and I find them endlessly fascinating.

The Reader in Paradise Lost ; rpt. Fish argues that the notion of different or same texts is fictions, if I read Lycidas and The Waste Land differently it will not be because the formal structure of the two poems call forth different interpretive strategies but because my predisposition to execute different interpretive strategies will produce different formal structures.

He also goes on to present, from the question of similarities in the interpretation, one of his main concepts:May 15,  · Stanley Fish, “Interpreting the Variorum” Posted on May 10, by katflei. 0. As the self-proclaimed “inventor” of reader response theory, Stanley Fish remains a controversial figure.

One of many critics to overturn the centrality of the text to New Criticism, Fish nevertheless ruffled feathers even in his own. Sep 30,  · Stanley Fish An article I read in my philosophy of literature class, "Interpreting the Variorum" argues for the concept of interpretive communities.

By this term, Fish means that there are communities that develop that interpret works based on their own cultural values and understandings.

Stanley Fish

Oct 06,  · In the present essay Fish questions New Criticism’s efforts to locate literary meaning in the formal features of the text, Labels: Criticism & Theory, Interpreting the Variorum, Stanley Fish.

1 comment: Shakthi Vendhan 19 April at it was very good and I received clear idea about variorum Thank you sir. Reply. Sep 09,  · Stanley Fish’s article “Interpreting the Variorum” is an essay in three parts. In essence, Fish dissects various lines of Milton’s Variorum Commentary and discusses the relationship of the work and the reader.

The reader’s knowledge, understanding (or even misunderstanding and successive controversy over the work). Sep 09,  · In his essay “Interpreting the Variorum” Stanley Fish makes the argument that the meaning of any literary work is crafted by the varying interpretations of the readers, and supports this claim by analyzing the different interpretative meanings of several poems by Milton.

According to Rivkin and Ryan Stanley Fish was the most important American critic who promoted reader-response criticism (). Merriam Webster’s Encyclopedia of Literature.

one from his earlier text Surprised by Sin and the second one from his essay “Interpreting the Variorum.

Fish, “Interpretive Communities” Summary Download
Interpreting the variorum essay by stanley fish
Rated 0/5 based on 94 review