He argues that many of the ideas that are supposed to be innate can be and have been derived naturally from sense experience, that not all people assent to those ideas that are supposed to be innate. Locke uses several arguments against the innateness hypothesis but his main argument is that for an idea to be innate it would have to be universally shared and present in children and idiots.
Make a short outline of the topics discussed in the Essay and show how these are related to the main purpose for which it was written. Locke maintains that even if reason enables people to discover the truth of certain ideas, those ideas cannot be said to be innate, for reason is needed to discover their truth.
Because the soul is too fragile to retain ideas. What reason do we have for believing in the existence of God?
Towards the end of the Book, Locke discusses the importance of words to philosophy and to truth in general. Locke then goes on to describe the multitude of ways our minds can operate on simple and complex ideas to generate what we think of as many other faculties and content of the mind.
What different degrees does he recognize, and how does he account for the differences? Book III follows roughly the same form as Book II, explaining how the different kinds of ideas can be communicated as different kinds of words.
In what areas can we have only probable knowledge?
The second section states his conclusion: How can one distinguish between genuine revelation and blind superstition? Many attempt to follow his trail, including David Hume and many modern philosophers.
Book IV concerns knowledge generally and Locke spends the section explaining how our ideas, derived from experience and our words can account for our knowledge of various things.
Finally Locke concludes by laying out a program for the future development of science along Lockean, empiricist lines. How does Locke distinguish between simple ideas and complex ideas? Finally, Locke tries to account for false and fantastical ideas.
These ideas can be abstracted further and further into general ideas. Locke begins his work in Book I by explaining the origin of the content of understanding, ideas. Our observation, employed either about external sensible objects, or about the internal operations of our minds perceived and reflected on by ourselves, is that which supplies our understandings with all the materials of knowledge.
There is also an analysis of good and evil into pleasure and pain. Locke also gives a unique empiricist proof of the existence for God and a strong attack on the possibility of faith and revelation. What reasons are given to support the belief that primary qualities are present in the external objects while secondary qualities are present only in the mind?
Criticize, from the point of view of logical adequacy, the arguments which Locke used to prove that innate ideas do not exist. What, according to Locke, are some of the common errors that result from a wrong use of words?
Let us then suppose the mind to be, as we say, white paper void of all characters, without any ideas. Do you think his conception of causality is consistent with his general theory of ideas?
His conclusion—that all knowledge is derived from sense experience—became the principal tenet of empiricism, which has dominated Western philosophy ever since. Locke first examines the notion that there are ideas that are a necessary part of human understanding and are, therefore, common to all people.
Although ostensibly an investigation into the nature of knowledge and understanding epistemology this work ranges farther afield than one might expect. Then, by reflection, by consideration of the mind in operation, people acquire the ideas of thinking, doubting, believing, knowing, willing, and so on.
Whence has it all the materials of reason and knowledge? Through a variety of simple procedures, simple ideas are transformed into complex ideas. How does Locke account for the origin and meaning of the idea of causality?An Essay Concerning Human Understanding Homework Help Questions.
Please provide a summary of the key concepts of John Locke's Essay concerning Human Understanding. John Locke's An Essay Concerning Human Understanding is a major work in the history of philosophy and a founding text in the empiricist approach to philosophical investigation.
Although ostensibly an investigation into the nature of knowledge and understanding (epistemology) this work ranges farther.
SOURCE: A foreword to An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, by John Locke, edited by Peter H. Nidditch, Oxford at the Clarendon Press,pp. vii-xxv. [In the following essay, Nidditch. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding Book I: Innate Notions John Locke This was what ﬁrst started me on this Essay Concerning the Understanding.
I thought that the ﬁrst step towards an-swering various questions that people are apt to raise. Full Glossary for An Essay Concerning Human Understanding; Essay Questions; Cite this Literature Note; Study Help Essay Questions Bookmark this page Manage My Reading List.
1. Give a brief account of the life of John Locke, mentioning in particular those events that were most influential in shaping the development of his philosophy. The Question and Answer section for An Essay Concerning Human Understanding is a great resource to ask questions, find answers, and discuss the novel.
Ask Your Own Question Study Guide for An Essay Concerning Human Understanding.Download