Considered to be one of the most respected philosophers of his time, Rene Descartes redirected the path of philosophy away from the traditional beliefs of Aristotle and Plato which has been adopted during the Medieval era.
An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Their origin will decide their value. I find the philosophy of Descartes more convincing than the idea of Locke.
The experiences we have include knowledge, power, life, self-expansion and other worldly incidents. Both of them attempt to find answers to the same questions in metaphysics and epistemology such as, what is knowledge? God is extremely good, so the world that He chooses to create and sustain must be good as well.
However, I believe that it is not entirely accurate to say that their philosophies are different and leave it at that. It takes time for us to realize the little things. Both Descartes and Locke attempt to find answers to the same questions in metaphysics and epistemology; among these: I will also then discuss a few important differences in their theories of knowledge, specifically the distinction between rationalism and empiricism and the question of the existence of innate ideas.
Such system requires a basis of intuitively understood principles from which knowledge can be deduced. The human mind is a perplex concept in which triggers one to interpret it in different light. Locke was frank enough to admit though that he has doubts whether or not mind, souls or matter can think independently.
Since he is not concerned with certainty, he need not abandon ideas based on perception. He argues that there are no innate ideas because, if there were, they would immediately be known to children, and they are not Locke, 8. According to Jon Locke, the mind at birth is a blank tablet, which is subsequently written upon by sensory experience.
For Descartes, knowledge depends on absolute certainty. Although I maintain that the philosophies of Descartes and Locke are different, this does not exclude the possibility of similarities.
The philosophies of Descartes and Locke diverge irreconcilably on the question of the origin of knowledge. Descartes concludes that these principles are innate Descartes, He argues that there are no innate ideas, they would immediately be known to children if there were.
According Descartes, knowledge depends on the absolute certainty. In contrast, Locke does not believe that there is any certain knowledge Locke, People are not conscious of memories however they are in the mind. He questions the whole concept and believes that it is impossible for something to be in the mind without one being aware of it.
On the second point Descartes believes that the imperfection is not one from God, but that our intellect is not as great as our will Descartes, In contrast, Locke says the self is both the soul and the body.
There is also non-conscious principles and knowledge. To summarize, Descartes and Locke are primarily skeptics about the probability of definite knowledge. I believe that it is not entirely accurate to say that their philosophies are different and leave it at that.
I will now consider four passages in which Locke appears to be drawing on Descartes: Therefore the body is material while the soul is immaterial since thought is a process which is said to occur in the soul. As to the existence of god, Descartes deems that this should be accounted for next to discovering what knowledge is.
Although I believe I have pointed to a number of undeniable similarities, I have not sketched anything resembling an overview of the philosophies of Descartes or Locke.
Genera are used to group things according to similarity, while species are used to identify differences or differentia Locke, It is their differences, not similarities, which characterize their overall theories of knowledge. Both Descartes and Locke are initially skeptics about the possibility of certain knowledge.
Nonetheless, I have tried to illustrate that despite a historical connection and many similarities, their philosophies are fundamentally different.A Comparison of Similarities and Differences Between Rene Descartes and John Locke, David Hume and Plato.
Term Paper, Philosophy Aaron Davis Evaluation & Comparison Between Descartes and Spinoza About The Paper: What I will do in this following paper is to discuss two very interesting philosophers, Rene Descartes and Benedictus de Spinoza.
View Essay - Descartes and Locke from HUMA at York University. Descartes and Locke: A Critical Comparison Ren Descartes and John Locke, both seventeenth century philosophers, are often seen as. Find Study Resources. TAGS Philosophy, Ode, %(3). Descartes and Locke are doubtful about knowledge.
Descartes went to school and received an education, however questioned what he had learned in school. Descartes had his fair share of opposing philosophers, but one of his main critiques was in the person of John Locke.
Rene Descartes Vs John Locke Philosophy Essay. Print Reference this. Disclaimer: Philosophy Essay Writing Service Free Essays More Philosophy Essays Examples of Our Work Philosophy Dissertation Examples. Essay on John Locke; Essay on John Locke. John Locke. Words | 8 Pages.
Locke starts with the questioning of Descartes's philosophy of Cogito Ergo Sum. Locke had empiricist beliefs, which discount the concept of innate ideas and promote the role of sensory perception and experiences in humans.
Lockes Views On Education; John .Download